Automated Manifest Sytstem (AMS)


ABI Error Message

VDA: MPF SURCHARGE CANT BE > $3.00

THIS MESSAGE RESULTS FROM AN ENTRY SUMMARY INPUT TRANSACTION (APPLICATION EI). FILERS IN TEST STATUS FOR CARGO RELEASE MUST INCLUDE AN MPF SURCHARGE AMOUNT OF $2.00 IF THE FILER IS NOT OPERATIONAL FOR CARGO RELEAES AT ANY OTHER PORT IN THE UNITED STATES. ABI WILL NOT ACCEPT A SURCHARGE AMOUNT GREATER THAN $3.00, IN ANY CASE.
VOP: DESIGNATED EXAM SITE NOT ALLOWED

THIS MESSAGE OCCURS WHEN A FILER SENDS A DDPP IN THE EI 30 RECORD, POSITIONS 40-43 FOR "DESIGNATED EXAM PORT" WHEN THE ENTRY IS NOT A REMOTE FILING ENTRY. 
79H: TARIFF FORMAT/CONTEXT ERROR

FORMAT OR CONTEXT ERROR
VHJ: DT HS7: BOND (SURETY) NOT ON FILE

IF BOX 03 IS USED (REC. DT01, POS 8-9,) THE DOT BOND MUST BE REPRESENTED BY A VALID SURETY CODE FROM THE SURETY DATA FILE. ABI DOES NOT EDIT THE SURETY CODE IN THIS FIELD TO SEE IF IT MATCHES THE SURETY CODE IN THE 10 RECORD OF THE SUMMARY INPUT.
054: ENTRY NBR NOT ASSIGNED TO BROKER

ENTRIES FILED THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 HAVE THE FOLLOWING NUMBER FORMAT: FISCAL YEAR (2 DIGITS); SEQUENCE NUMBER (6 DIGITS); CHECK DIGIT (1 DIGIT) ENTRIES FILED AFTER SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 HAVE THE FOLLOWING NUMBER FORMATS: FILER CODE (3 CHARACTERS, ALPHA NUMERIC); SEQUENCE NUMBER (7 DIGITS); CHECK DIGIT (1 DIGIT) USUALLY THIS ERROR IS INVOKED WHEN THERE IS NO MATCH FOR THE ENTRY NUMBER FOUND IN THE ACS ENTRY SUMMARY FILES- USER COULD HAVE MADE A TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR IN THE ENTRY NUMBER.
VAQ: COMM. INVOICE DATA NOT ON FILE

FILERS WHO PARTICIPATE IN THE ELECTRONIC INVOICE PROGRAM (EIP) MUST TRANSMIT COMMERCIAL INVOICE DATA TO ABI PRIOR TO TRANSMITTING THEIR SUMMARY DATA IF THE SUMMARY CONTAINS AN "E" IN POS 56 OF THE 10 RECORD. IF THE FILER IS PARTICIPATING IN THE INVOICE BY REQUEST PROGRAM, THEN IT IS PERMISSABLE TO TRANSMIT THE 42 RECORD WITH THE INVOICE NUMBER AND THE 43 RECORD WITH THE "INVREQ" DATA WITHOUT FIRST TRANSMITTING THE COMMERCIAL INVOICE. HOWEVER, UNLESS ONE OF THE TWO CONDITIONS ABOVE IS MET, A TRANSMISSION OF THE SUMMARY AS AN ELECTRONIC SUMMARY (EIP) WILL BE REJECTED WITH THIS ERROR MESSAGE. **NOTE** IF THE FILER USES MORE THAN ONE 42 RECORD PER 40 RECORD, AND "INVREQ" PERTAINS TO THE 42 RECORD, EACH 42 RECORD MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A 43 RECORD. IF THIS PAIRING IS NOT FOLLOWED, THIS ERROR MESSAGE WILL RESULT.
VBS: INV CLARIFICATION CODE FOR BOX

THIS MESSAGE WILL BE GENERATED IF A CLARIFICATION CODE (REC DT01, POS 37) OTHER THAN "V" IS USED FOR HS7 BOX NUMBERS 03, 06, OR 12 (REC DT01, POS 8-9).
28N: *CENSUS* IMPROBABLE MFR/SHPER ID

AN ENTRY WITH A COUNTRY OF ORIGIN OR COUNTRY OF EXPORT OF 'CA' IS ENTERED AND THE FIRST TWO BYTES OF THE MANUFACTURER IS OTHER THAN 'XA" 'XC' 'XM' 'XB' 'XW' 'XN' 'XO' 'XP' 'XQ' 'XS'. 
06N: RDP NOT AUTH FOR C/S CALL UAG

THIS MESSAGE OCCURS WHEN A FILER CERTIFIES FOR CARGO SELECTIVITY WHEN THE PORT OF ENTRY IS NOT OPERATIONAL FOR CARGO SELECTIVITY (THE DISTRICT-PORT RECORD FOR THE PORT SHOWS C/S = "N"). THIS ERROR REJECTS THE CERTIFICATION FOR CARGO SELECTIVITY PROCESSING. IT DOES NOT REJECT THE SUMMARY. THE FILER SHOULD VERIFY THAT THEY ARE USING THE PROPER PORT OF ENTRY. THIS PROBLEM OCCURS REGULARLY BETWEEN OAKLAND AND SAN FRANCISCO. OAKLAND (2811) IS THE CORRECT PORT OF UNLADING. THE PROPER PORT OF ENTRY FOR OAKLAND IS SAN FRANCISCO (2809). THE PROBLEM IS FIXED BY HAVING THE FILER RETRANSMIT WITH THE PROPER PORT OF ENTRY (IN THIS CASE, 2809) IF THE CORRECT PORT OF ENTRY IS NOT OPERATIONAL FOR CARGO SELECTIVITY, THE ENTRY MUST BE HANDLED NON-ABI.
VAG: DT HS7: INVALID BOX CERTIFICATIN

ONLY A "Y" IS PERMITTED TO TRANSMIT THE BOX CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT (RECORD DT01, POS 10). ANY OTHER CHARACTER WILL GENERATE THIS MESSAGE. 
APX: FAX INDICATOR CANNOT CHANGE

NOTIFICATION TO CUSTOMS THAT A FACSIMILE WAS SENT, INDICATED BY 'S', MAY BE SUBMITTED BY FILER AT INITIAL FILING OF PROTEST, CLAIM OR INTERVENTION. 'N' INDICATES THAT NO FACSIMILE WAS SENT. NO VALUE SUBMITTED IN THE FAX INDICATOR WILL BE ACCEPTED AFTER INITIAL FILING. 
ASN: ARGUMENT/JUSTIFICATION N/A

ADDITIONAL NARRATIVE IS NOT ACCEPTED WHEN A SERVICE REQUEST IS FILED REQUEST REVIEW OF DENIAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR FURTHER REVIEW. THAT REVIEW WILL BE BASED SOLELY ON THE INFORMATION BEFORE THE CUSTOMS SERVICE AT THE TIME THE APPLICATION FOR FURTHER REVIEW WAS DENIED. 
16G: TARIFF NO. MISSING OR UNRELATED

THIS ERROR MESSAGE HAS OCCURRED IN WATCH ENTRIES WHERE THERE ARE MORE THAN TARIFF NUMBERS INVOLVED AND ONE OF THE TARIFF NUMBERS IS NOT RELATED. SEE TARIFF FILE TO DETERMINE PROPER COMBINATIONS. 
AQ1: FILING PERIOD BASE DATE REJECTED

THE FILING PERIOD BASE DATE MUST BE IN CCYYMMDD FORMAT, OR DOES NOT APPLY. 
VAH: DT HS7: PASSPORT NUMBER REQUIRED

IF BOX 5 IS SELECTED (REC DT01, POS 8-9) A PASSPORT NUMBER IS REQUIRED (REC DT01 POS 11-29).
RB7: R89 AND R21 ORIG AMTS DIFFER

TTHIS MEANS THAT THE ORIGINAL FEE AMOUNTS GIVEN FOR AN ENTRY-BY-ENTRY RECON IN THE 'R21' RECORDS FOR A GIVEN CLASS CODE DO NOT AGREE WITH THE 'R89' TOTAL ORIGINAL FEE AMOUNT FOR THAT CLASS CODE GIVEN IN THE 'R89' RECORD(S).
BL2: UNLAD DP CANNOT EQUAL ENTRY DP

IF AN IN-BOND NUMBER (EITHER CONVENTIONAL OR "V" NUMBER) IS SENT IN POSITIONS 3-14 OF THE 22 RECORD (EI) OR POSITIONS 3-14 OF THE HA RECORD (HI) THEN THE DISTRICT PORT OF UNLADING (POSITIONS 30-33 OF THE EI 20 RECORD OR POSITIONS 65-68 OF THE HI H1 RECORD) CANNOT BE THE SAME AS THE ENTRY DISTRICT PORT. 
VDK: CALCULATED TIB DT LT CURRENT DATE

THIS MESSAGE OCCURS ONLY IN A TIB (ENTRY TYPE 23) SITUATION WHEN THE TIB TARIFF NUMBER (E.G. 98130075), ACCORDING TO US HEADNOTE 1 TO THE RELEVANT SUBCHAPTER CANNOT BE EXTENDED AND MUST BE EXPORTED WITHIN 6 MONTHS AND THE "TIB DATE OF ENTRY" IS MORE THAN SIX MONTHS OLDER THAN THE CURRENT DATE.
VHI: DT HS7: DOT BOND CODE REQUIRED

IF BOX 03 IS USED (REC DT01, POS 8-9), THE ENTRY MUST BE BONDED FOR DOT. A BOND SURETY CODE MUST BE TRANSMITTED IN THE DT01 RECORD, POS 32-34. NO OTHER BOX NUMBER PERMITS THE USE OF THE BOND CODE. 
EJU: ITEM AMT MUST=UNIT PRCXNO PRC UNT

THIS MESSAGE IS GENERATED IN RESPONSE TO AN AUTOMATED INVOICE TRANSACTION (APPLICATION CI). THE C33 RECORD ENABLES THE FILER TO REPORT NUMBER OF ITEMS IMPORTED, COST PER ITEM AND TOTAL COST FOR THE ITEM, AMONG OTHER ELEMENTS. IF THE NUMBER OF PRICING UNITS, WHEN MULTIPLIED BY THE PRICE PER UNIT, DOES NOT EQUAL THE "ITEM AMOUNT" TOTAL, REPORTED IN POS 37-51 OF THIS RECORD, THIS ERROR MESSAGE WILL BE GENERATED. THE FIGURE SENT TO ABI CAN VARY BY UP TO, BUT NOT OVER, $1 (PLUS OR MINUS) FROM THE CALCULATED AMOUNT FOR "ITEM AMOUNT" TO BE ACCEPTABLE TO ABI.
AE4: WARNING! ENTRY DATE < EXPORT DATE

THIS WARNING MESSAGE OCCURS IN THE "REVISED FILER DATE" (DN) TRANSACTION WHEN A FILER TRANSMITS AN ENTRY DATE THAT IS EARLIER THAN THE EXPORT DATE THAT RESIDES IN THE LINE ITEM FILE OF THE ENTRY SUMMARY RECORD.  
27A: CENSUS IMPROBABLE COUNTRY

THIS MESSAGE IS AN ABI REPLY TO AN ENTRY SUMMARY (EI) INPUT TRANSACTION. IT INDICATES THAT THE DATA COLLECTED BY CENSUS DOES NOT INDICATE THAT THE TARIFF NUMBER FOR THE LINE IN QUESTION HAS NOT BEEN PREVIOUSLY REPORTED FROM THE TRANSMITTED COUNTRY OF ORIGIN. THE FILER SHOULD VERIFY THE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN AND/OR TARIFF NUMBER AND, IF NECESSARY, MAKE CORRECTIONS. IF THE DATA IS ACCURATE AS TRANSMITTED, NO FURTHER ACTION VIA ABI IS NECESSARY.
AQO: FILING PERIOD BASE DATE N/A

THE BEGINNING OF THE FILING & AMENDMENT PERIOD FOR A PROTEST, CLAIM OR INTERVENTION CAN BE DETERMINED IN ANY OF SEVERAL WAYS. WHEN PROTESTING DENIAL OF A 520(C) OR 520(D) CLAIM IT IS THE DATE OF DENIAL. INTERVENTIONS MAY BE FILED ANY TIME BEGINNING WITH FILING OF ADVERSE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN MARKING DECISION ENDING WITH USCS DECISION. FOR PROTESTS OR CLAIMS RELATED TO ENTRIES, LIQUIDATION DATE CONSTITUTES THE START OF THE PERIOD. ANY OTHER CASE REQUIRES A FILING/AMENDMENT PERIOD BASE DATE BE SUBMITTED BY THE FILER, TO BE VERIFIED BY USCS. A FILING/AMENDMENT PERIOD BASE DATE IS NOT APPLICABLE IN THIS CASE.
BRY: POSSIBLE DUTY MISMATCH

R20 ORIGINAL DUTY DOES NOT MATCH PAID / LIQ DUTY THIS MESSAGE IS RETURNED IF THE R20 REC, POS 23-33, AMOUNT DOES NOT EXACTLY AGREE WITH THE PAID DUTY ON THE ENAI RECORD FOR THE IMPORT ENTRY LISTED IN THE R20 RECORD, POS 8-18.THERE CAN BE SEVERAL CAUSES FOR THIS ERROR, BUT THE MOST COMMON ONE IS THAT THE FILER WILL SEND ALL ZEROS IN THE R20 FOR AN IMPORT ENTRY THAT HAD DUTY PAID. ANOTHER POSSIBLE REASON IS WHEN TWO OR MORE COLLECTIONS WERE DEPOSITED ON THE SAME IMPORT ENTRY AND THE FILER HAS NOT KEPT ACCURATE RECORDS REFLECTING THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF DUTY PAID. 
2G2: DUPLICATE AIRWAY/BILL LADING NO.

THIS MESSAGE IS A RESPONSE TO A CARGO RELEASE DATA INPUT TRANSACTION (APPLICATION HI). IF THE HA RECORDS CONTAIN DUPLICATE AIR WAYBILLS OR BILL OF LADING NUMBERS, THIS MESSAGE WILL BE GENERATED. THE DUPLICATION MUST BE EXACT FROM ONE HA RECORD TO THE NEXT. IF THE SECOND RECORD CONTAINS THE SAME MASTER BILL OR AIR WAYBILL RECORD, BUT INCLUDES A HOUSE OR HOUSE/SUBHOUSE BILL, THE PRESENCE OF THE ADDITIONAL BILL DATA WILL BE SUFFICIENT TO MAKE EACH HA RECORD DISTINCT.

 Next 10 >>Showing results 1 to 25 of 1405
Add To: add to del.icio.us add to digg add to technorati add to furl add to reddit

If you find this information helpful, please leave a donation to support Informed Trade International's ongoing mission to help importers improve their understanding of international trade.
 
© copyright Informed Trade International a division of danifer.com